=== |
zamii;N ik .saf;hah-e ta.sviir-e be-hoshaa;N se maanaa hai
yih majlis jab se hai achchhaa nahii;N kuchh rang .su;hbat kaa
1) the ground/earth is the semblance of a single/particular/unique/excellent page with a picture of unconscious ones
2) ever since this gathering has existed, there is no good color/mood/enjoyment of companionship/sociability
be-hosh : 'Unconscious, insensible, stupefied, intoxicated, delirious; senseless, stupid'. (Platts p.204)
maanaa : 'Like, resembling; assimilating (to); equal'. (Platts p.984)
rang : 'Colour, colouring matter, pigment, paint, dye; colour, tint, hue, complexion; beauty, bloom; expression, countenance, appearance, aspect; fashion, style; character, nature; mood, mode, manner, method; kind, sort; state, condition; ... —a place of public amusement or for dramatic exhibition, theatre, stage; dancing; singing; acting; sport, entertainment, amusement, merriment, pleasure, enjoyment'. (Platts p.601)
.su;hbat : 'Companionship, society, company; an assembly, meeting, association; a fair; discourse, conversation'. (Platts p.743)
FWP:
SETS == EK
MOTIFS == GATHERINGS; WRITING
NAMES
TERMS == DASTAN; GROUND; TILISMThe earth-- literally 'ground', which of course is a technical term in the realm of poetics-- can readily be likened to a page, because it's flat and spread-out. The page it's compared to here is ik -- with all the possible nuances, ranging from dismissive (a mere, single page) to admiring (a unique, peerless page), of that protean little number. It's an illustrated page-- and the picture on it shows people who are 'unconscious'. In its literal sense, this adjective works very well, since 'unconscious' people are motionless and still, like the figures in a picture. (As such, they might be helpless, and thus morally blameless.) Or the adjective could be taken in its extended sense-- the people depicted on the page could be 'intoxicated' or 'delirious' or 'stupid', as can be seen from the definition above. (In which case they might be culpable and subject to reproach.)
In any case, if we think of the earth as a (depiction of a) social gathering, it obviously can't be a very lively or enjoyable one. The second line makes exactly this complaint, and traces it back to the beginning of the earthly gathering. In this gathering there never has been, from the very start, any 'color, mood, enjoyment' [rang] of 'companionship, conversation' [.su;hbat]. It must be like the worst party in the world, only you can't leave and go to another party-- in fact, you can't leave at all, except presumably through the fire-escape door of death.
Which invites us to wonder about the status of the speaker. Is he too at the party? His use of 'this' makes us think so. And yet since he makes such a complaint, he seems to be aware; he's apparently he's not one of the 'unconscious ones'. Moreover, his complaint about the party extends back, apparently, to the origin of the earth-- which also serves to mark him as having (or at least claiming) special knowledge. Is he dead, and speaking retrospectively? Is he a specially endowed mystical knower, revealing the insights of the Sufi path?
Once the speculation begins, one more possibility presents itself. If you think about parties, you know there's sometimes one guest who gets really drunk and starts complaining: 'This party's dead-- nothing's happening! You're all just sitting there like bumps on a log! C'mon, look alive! Let's go and...' followed by some crazy proposal. Some of the guests just roll their eyes, but sometimes others are intrigued. Who knows what's going to happen next?