FWP:
SETS == IZAFAT; MULTIVALENT WORDS ( rashk )
FRIEND/ENEMY: {4,3}
ABOUT rashk : As can be seen from the definitions above, rashk is a versatile word. In principle, 'envy' is a broad term for the pain caused by non-possession: the fact that someone else has something that you don't have but want to have (as in {116,10}). And 'jealousy' is a kind of pain caused by possession: the fear of losing someone (or something) that you have, to someone else (as in {99,2}). The word rashk can not only cover both-- if indeed they can really be kept apart (as in {404x,5} they cannot)-- but can include more general possibilities of 'grudge, spite, malice' as well.
Needless to say, Ghalib pushes a concept like this
to its limits. He reflects on rashk involving envy/jealousy
of: testing ({4,9x}); faithfulness ({12,3x});
a sword ({60,4}); a bird ({123,5});
a sacred thread ({173,7}). He also considers
it that it might be mutual ({42,5}); or directed
against oneself ({153,1}); or even rejected
entirely ({198,1}). On jalnaa as 'to burn with jealousy/envy', see {60,1} and {312x,6}. (By contrast, ;hasad has the sense of 'envy, malice', but no such overtones of jealousy.)
Here the dead lover speaks, and analyzes the circumstances of his demise. (For other verses in which the dead lover speaks, see {57,1}.) His death was caused by 'the injustice/iniquity of the envy/jealousy of the Other'.
In the present verse, thanks to the versatility of the i.zaafat , the 'envy/jealousy of the Other' [rashk-e ;Gair] can mean two opposite things: either 'the speaker's envy of the Other', that is, the envy/jealousy felt by him toward the Other; or 'the Other's envy/jealousy of the speaker', that is, the envy felt by the Other toward him. Either way, the second line provides further wordplay: it was the speaker's ironic fate to be finally struck down (in whatever sense) by the 'enemy', even though he was initially made sick (with love) by the 'friend'.
If it was the lover's envy of the Other that finished him off, the reason might be that the beloved was far kinder to the Other than she ever was to him. Or if the envy was the other way around, perhaps the Other told lies to the beloved about the lover, or started malicious rumors. Perhaps he even visited the sick lover, and boasted about his own access to the beloved. The verse-set in this ghazal ({53,6-10}) seems to envision just such a situation.
In either case, the envy is characterized by not just cruelty
but, literally, 'injustice' [bedaad]. The final irony
is that whichever of the two lovers is envying the other, the envy is misplaced,
inappropriate, unjust. Because the beloved is so fundamentally untrustworthy
that in fact her favor can't be counted on by anyone. For a more explicit
analysis of the lover's envy and the beloved's fickleness, see {42,1}.
Nazm:
The cause of being sick over the friend is passion, and the cause of being killed by the enemy is that the envy/jealousy of the enemy slew me. (48)
== Nazm page 48